Wednesday, 19 May 2010

Mosquitoes

At a public forum around mosquito issues about fifty residents came to express their concerns about being bitten and about environmental protection. We heard strongly- worded views about the need for personal safety, about concern for native species and about how Council responds to these concerns.

Resident after resident told their story about cycles of mosquitoes in the evenings. Very many people demanded that the City fog the Canning River wetlands regularly. Many felt that the City was not responding to their needs.

After an hour of clearly- expressed views of residents the City’s Manager, Environmental Health outlined the very extensive work carried out over five years. Sebastian’s team, all with Environmental Science qualifications, had trapped, mapped and measured mosquito issues in the area. Sebastian presented a summary of work done and conclusions reached. He also presented a background of control measures already taken and plans for the future.

The second speaker, Department of Health medical entomologist Sue Harrington, provided some scientific background on the 210 species of mosquito in Australia and their breeding, biting and bothering habits. She pointed out that fogging over marine wetlands was illegal and likely to cause widespread fish deaths. Fogging also kills all types of insects- bees, spiders, moths and mosquitoes.

Ms Harrington compared local mosquito levels with those in Capel and the Kimberley, where truly massive concentrations occur. She also suggested that residents live near the river because they value the environment, with its trees, fish and other fauna. In order to sustain these things we value she suggested that we treat the mosquito issue with respect for the whole environment.

One particular control measure Ms Harrington suggested was a naturally- occurring bacteria, widely used throughout WA. Capel has been hugely successful with this measure. They spread this biological agent twice a year, never fog and hardly see a mosquito. Their mosquito management strategy is on their web site. A good thing about this method is that the biological agent does not affect other species.

A third speaker, from Swan River Trust, provided information on wider issues of environmental management. An outcome of the meeting was to set up a residents’ committee to meet with the City and  communicate more about management of mosquitoes.

image

How Can You Assist? (Quoted from Capel)

Mosquitoes breed in STANDING WATER. Standing water can be found in old tyres and other water holding containers, pot plant drip trays, septic and water tanks, roof gutters, domestic ponds, etc. By eliminating these breeding sites you can help to reduce mosquito numbers in your backyard.

You can help eliminate breeding in your backyard:

  • Dispose of all containers which hold water.

  • Keep ornamental ponds stocked with mosquito-eating fish, e.g. goldfish.

  • Empty self- watering pot plant trays once a week or fill them with sand.

  • Empty and clean animal and pet drinking water once a week.

  • Keep swimming pools well chlorinated and filtered and free of dead leaves.

  • Fill or drain depressions in the ground that hold water.

  • Prevent leaking taps which can maintain semi-permanent pools.

  • Avoid over watering lawns. This can lead to high water tables or run off to storm water drains and create permanent pools.

  • Vent pipes on septic tank systems must be fitted with mosquito- proof cowls. Seal all gaps in the lid, and ensure leach drains are completely covered.

  • Screen rainwater tanks and/or add paraffin oil to cover surface.

  • Ensure roof guttering does not hold water.

  • Some plants (especially bromeliads) hold water in their leaf axils. These should be emptied of water once a week.

I look forward to hearing that a collaborative approach has this matter under control to everyone’s satisfaction.

Tuesday, 18 May 2010

What is a Good Mayor?

The City of South Perth is developing measures to assess our CEO. In the process of doing this there has been discussion about assessing our Mayor and Councillors too. While thinking about this I’ve put together some thoughts about what makes a good Mayor. In the spirit of getting everybody involved, here’s a list that you might like to comment on or add to.

  • The Mayor leads community participation in local decision- making, encouraging a spirit of inclusion
  • The Mayor effectively manages both long and short term strategy and involves Councillors in Strategic Leadership
  • The Mayor encourages contributions by Council members and gets the best out of them
  • The Mayor develops the Leadership Team (Councillors and Executives) with energy, motivation and optimism
  • The Mayor encourages all elected members to take on a leadership role
  • The Mayor clearly takes charge of the evaluation and coaching of members
  • The Mayor is effective in managing the technical and emotional components of leadership
  • The Mayor demonstrates a sound understanding of the legislative, policy, planning and values frameworks of our City
  • The Mayor makes sure that the Council meetings are well run
  • The Mayor represents Council effectively at official functions and ceremonies
  • The Mayor helps promote a positive image of Council
  • The Mayor handles conflict within the leadership team fairly and impartially, to bring prompt resolution or return to a working relationship
  • The Mayor chairs meetings impartially and effectively
  • The Mayor demonstrates effective influence when dealing with internal and external parties
  • The Mayor deals effectively with the media
  • The Mayor keeps up to date with political, technical and management issues
  • The Mayor is an effective negotiator
  • The Mayor promotes ethical and accountable behaviour

What do you think we should expect of a Mayor? I believe that to be useful this list should not refer to any individual, but rather to the post itself.

Next will be a similar question in reference to our Councillors.

Please feel free to have your say; it makes a difference. Just click on “Comments” and log in as Name or Anonymous, or email me and I’ll post your comments for you.

Monday, 3 May 2010

Changes in Perth- Living and Travelling

Perth region is growing fast. Change is happening; sometimes we notice, sometimes not. Since 2003 car ownership has grown 39%. Freeways and roads are often crowded. Public transport use has grown 40%, car use per capita has declined 7%. At peak times the rail system carries the equivalent of 8 lanes of traffic. Last year we made 55 million train trips.

The growing success of our rail system is told around the world. Peter Newman and Jan Scheurer of Curtin Uni have released a report on our transport, where we are and what we can do next.

Some of the development background for thinking includes:

  • Doubling of Curtin University (including six 20 storey residential towers)
  • Rapidly growing health and education precinct at Fiona Stanley/ Murdoch Uni
  • Doubling of Bentley Technology Park;
  • Large increase in residential and commercial development in Victoria Park
  • Riverside Development adjacent to the WACA and
    Trinity, including extensive high rise and medium rise residences and commercial premises
  • The eastern end of Central Perth where most of the new high rise has been happening and more is expected
  • Northbridge Link: the largest urban regeneration in Central Perth, directly above the Central rail station and the new underground bus terminal
  • Redevelopment of the PMH site on Thomas Street
  • The largest health complex in Perth with the new PMH and Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital
  • UWA complex set to double in size

A light- rail arc is proposed, linking these developments. The authors speak of the knowledge economy as the basis of all new developed- economy jobs and of this rail  link connecting the knowledge centres of our city.

A motivation for light rail is that all of these developments are severely limited by transport and parking issues. It is already often difficult to park anywhere near these centres and traffic is slow; transport is a limiting factor for our future.

The report is relevant also to our local conversation about Canning Bridge. We have a vision for Transit Oriented Development here. The report cites evidence from around the world that people living in a TOD have 50% less car use and save $20,000 a year through needing one less car per household.

I find it interesting that nearly everyone agrees with the benefits of a good rail system and TOD- style development but that there is controversy around such things happening anywhere near us.

While leading a bushwalking group around Mundaring Weir yesterday I was talking over these issues with others. The concern was with how we fit in more people and preserve our bush and maintain the lifestyle we love, in an attractive community and do it all sustainably.

The way in which we put all this together is what will make the difference.

Your thoughts? Click on ‘Comments’ below. Log in with Name or Anonymous.