Can we have some useful discussion about Councils now, please?
Local Government influences our lives every day. Surely we can do it better. As the debates become more trivial our Councils are seriously distracted from what they are elected for. The voters just shake their heads and look away. Let’s get better at this.
Councils in WA employ 14,000 people, have 1,300 elected members, receive $M274 in grants, raise more from Rates and have $13 billion of capital assets. Almost no Councils are keeping up a required level of asset maintenance. An Access Economics study concluded that “The long-term finances of a majority of WA Councils look unsustainable.”
The worlds of finance, environment and society have become complex beyond the skills of many elected members and many voters. Way too few Councillors are able to understand the financial and governance issues around overseeing such operations. It’s just not good enough to spend valuable meeting time debating Mrs Jones’ fence, Council boundaries and the flat roof next door.
Current focus on boundaries and amalgamations is far short of a useful discussion about what we want from our Councils. Size is a distraction. What do you think we should focus on?
Some Councils are trying to raise the skills of Councillors by offering training courses. Unfortunately the people who need these skills most are often not the ones who enlist. Compulsory training seems to be too hard to enforce. Here are my thoughts on what it takes to be a Councillor. Perhaps these thoughts should apply to Members of Parliament too.
MUST HAVE
- Interest in long-term direction of the local community.
- Listening skills, prepared to listen more often than to tell
- Prepared to meet with the community, often.
- At least one, and usually two or three evenings a week to dedicate to meetings, workshops and briefings.
- Able to read and understand a big weekly information pack.
- Ability to think strategically about organisational purpose.
- Effective decision-making skills. Not as simple as it sounds.
- Understand the difference between individual and group decision-making.
- Able to work to sustain long-term viability and define values for self and the Council.
- Able to imagine and lead new future directions.
- Empathy.
- Able to discuss widely differing opinions respectfully and to disagree agreeably.
- Able to synthesise direction amidst complexity and conflicting values and objectives.
- Understand the difference between management and leadership (Councillors have no executive authority at all)
- Not be focussed on a ‘single issue’.
- Be prepared to assess your own biases and positions.
- Ability to read and interpret financial reports.
- Sense of humour.
- Collaborative style.
- Wide range of contacts and life experience.
- Be well travelled and widely read.
- An enquiring mind.
- Risk assessment skills. Risk is a daily consideration.
- Open to continuous learning.
- Expertise in at least one relevant field, e.g. architecture, town planning, finance, environment, waste, law, social services, communications, psychology, science.
- Board experience.
- Qualifications such as MBA, GAICD (Australian Institute of Company Directors).
- Preparedness to respond with good grace and respect in all sorts of circumstances.
Please contribute your thoughts by clicking on Comments, below. Just log in as Name or Anonymous, or email me.
This page sponsored by my company, DATA365, specialists in data recovery from crashed disks.
6 comments:
I think the musts, shoulds and goods are well selected. I fully support it. I believe that lots of councils do not look beyond the rates they collect and the yearly festivals they organise. There is a lack of imagination and the ones who have it get frustrated by the small-minded arguments which tou have mentioned in your blog.
What is wrong with the name South Perth? Why do we all have to change something that has been around for Perth's history?
Change the boundaries and merge the councils, but leave the name alone. I bought in South Perth, not South Park!!!! I bet the person who chose this name doesn't even live in South Perth!!! Think of all the costs to people and businesses changing names and stationery etc. What an absolute waste of time and money. can it not be challenged in Court. This minister did the same in Burswood, selling off Crown land to Packer and stuff all the residents in the units. I sold an investment unit there and lost a lot of money because of the changes.
I was suitably impressed with your intensive research and ideas-one of my major beliefs is we have to start working together in a much more positive way, and letting our ego get out of the way, and becoming a real team.
This means we have to be flexible and clear in stating our opinions but able to let them go if others disagree, so being a team player.
This has to be balanced by having different views, backgrounds, and information so that the final decision is a good balanced one, and that most due to research can see this is the logical solution to a problem, not just a mid way point all can agree to.
good healthy debate is always needed, with time to let the information settle and feel congruent to the person.
cheers
Van
Thanks for your continuing efforts to raise the issues. You provided much food for thought. I saw one response which supported your views
Unfortunately as I am sure you know, neighbours fences, trees, huge new residences etc are what residents have most concerns about & until there is a better more empathetic way to deal with them Councils will continue to be criticised. Of course Admin is important but many folk are unaware of the mechanisms & responsibilities of LGAs and have no sympathies if their every day concerns are not being well handled. Who else can residents go to if the Council is not providing good guidance?
Mediation would be a good skill to have, we can't all have exactly what we think is right & proper but if we can understand the reasons for other opinions / decisions it may help.
Local Councils were designed to give local people a voice in their community & how it should be run. It seems to me that aim has been suffocated by the bigger picture stuff, so that people feel helpless & insignificant. Sure times have changed but residents still need to feel relevant if they are to continue to value their communities.
I'd like to say hear, hear - I'd love to see local government start spending their time on useful business...
Thanks for mentioning the Company Directors Course in your "Good to Have" list. We really appreciate your recommendation.
Juliet
Australian Institute of Company Directors
Post a Comment